Allowed

M/S Haria Exports Limite v. M/S.Aries Remedies Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC24 Nov 2016CA/583/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this company application, the Bombay High Court condoned the absence of the petitioner and its advocate during the dismissal of a company petition previously held due to non-appearance and non-advertisement. The application for recall and condonation of delay was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Condoned the delay and recalled the dismissal order dated 27 July 2010, restoring the company petition to file.

M/S Haria Exports Limite Vs M/S.Aries Remedies Pvt. Ltd. — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

CA 583-15.doc

¶2

1/2

¶3

Chittewan

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.583 OF 2015 IN

¶6

COMPANY PETITION NO.619 OF 2006

¶7

M/s Haria Exports Limited … Applicant/ Original Petitioner In the matter between : M/s Haria Exports Limited ... Petitioner Versus M/s Aries Remedies Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent

¶8

Mr. Avinash Kanto for the Applicant/original Petitioner.

¶9

CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.

¶10

DATE : 24 NOVEMBER 2016.

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

. This application is for recall of the dismissal order passed on 27 July 2010 in the petition herein. On that date, the Petitioner and its Advocate were absent. They were absent even on the earlier occasion. The Court noted that the admission of the petition was not advertised and that no other creditor had appeared. In the premises, the Company Petition was dismissed.

¶13

2 The application has been duly served on the Respondent and an affidavit in proof of such service has already been filed.

¶14

CA 583-15.doc

¶15

2/2

¶16

Chittewan

¶17

3 It is contended by the Applicant (original Petitioner) in its additional affidavit that it was prevented by reasonable excuses from attending the matter on 27 July 2010. The reasons are stated in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the additional affidavit. The Applicant has also pointed out that contrary to the observation of the Court in the order dated 27 July 2010, the petition was actually advertised in local Newspapers and also in the Maharashtra Government Gazette as far back in July 2016. The Applicant, in the premises, seeks condonation of delay and recall of the dismissal order.

¶18

4 For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Company Application as also in the additional affidavit tendered today, the delay is condoned and the dismissal order dated 27 July 2010 is recalled. The Company Petition is restored to file and shall come up in due course for hearing.

¶19

(S.C.GUPTE, J.)

M/S Haria Exports Limite v. M/S.Aries Remedies Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Haria Exports Limite v. M/S.Aries Remedies Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Enercon Gmbh Vs Wind World (India) Limited and 40 Anrs.

Enercon GmbH Vs Wind World (India) Limited and 9 Other

Ram Nanda and Co., through Its Partner Sh.Vimal Nanda Vs Mrs.Vidya Mangal and Anr.

Ramawatar G Pandey Vs the Official Liquidator of M/S Modistone Ltd.

Rajmani Mahadeo Shukla Vs the Official Liquidator of Modistone Ltd.

Mvm Buildtech Vs Rizvi Estate and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Cin U70100MH1978PTC020714