In a contempt petition, the appeal against a judgment appeared non-compliant, but the learned AGP stated that the order dated 10th January 2015 was complied with. Accordingly, the court decided to dispose of the contempt petition as there was no objection to the compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DB.23.CP.429.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.429 OF 2014
Shaikh S.D. versus Sanjaykumar and others
Petitioner
Respondents
None present for Petitioner. Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP, for State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 14th December 2016
PC :
It is stated by learned AGP that the order dated 10th January 2015 (Exhibit-M) of which non compliance has been complained of, is complied with. In the reply also, a stand has been taken that the order dated 10th January 2015 is complied with. In the circumstances, in our considered view, the contempt petition deserves to be disposed of. It stands disposed of as accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
MST
Shaikh S.D.
Sanjaykumar and others
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
