The single judge dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous on the finding that the impugned order has already been complied with after the filing of the petition.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-202-13.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.202 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4039 OF 2000
Priyamvada Prasad Tokekar .. Petitioner V/s. Kumar B. Khaire & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Swaraj Jadhav i/b. Mr. Mihir Desai, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Rui A. Rodrigues, Advocate for Respondent No.6. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent–State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 14, 2016.
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after filing of the petition, the order of which non compliance is complained of has been complied with. In the circumstances, Contempt Petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly Contempt Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Priyamvada Prasad Tokekar
Kumar B. Khaire
Prakash D. Naik
Shantanu S. Kemkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
