This court disposed of a contempt petition where the respondent contended that an earlier order of this court had been complied with belatedly, thereby purging the contempt.
Contempt stands purged and the petition is disposed of without costs. Petitioners are at liberty to assail the impugned order in appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP401.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 401 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7336 OF 2013
Shashikala W/o. Hausrao Khedkar and another .. Petitioners Versus Namdeo Nannaware .. Respondent
Shri Balaji Shinde h/f Shri V. P. Latange, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri Prashant D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent / Sole.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2016.
PER COURT :-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
sam/Aug.16
Shashikala W/o. Hausrao Khedkar and another
Namdeo Nannaware
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
