Petitioner withdrew writ petition after resorting to alternate remedy; Court disposed of matter as withdrawn, awarding no costs.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2953.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2953 OF 2013
Ambajogai Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through its I/c Managing Director .. Petitioner Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents
Shri D. J. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Deshpande, A.S.G. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 09TH AUGUST, 2016.
PER COURT :
. Mr. Choudhari, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that, he has received communication from the petitioner that, the petitioner has resorted to alternate remedy and has instructed him to withdraw the writ petition. The said communication is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/August 16
Ambajogai Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
The Union of India
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
