In this contempt appeal, the petitioner stated that a seized weapon had been returned following the impugned order. Finding no deliberate breach of the orders of this Court or the Magistrate, the matter was disposed of without disproportionate penalty.
Contempt petition disposed of as no deliberate breach was established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp-367.16.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.367 OF 2016
Gulam Mustafa Malik … Petitioner Vs. S.G. Sabale and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Tushar Narayan Sonawane for the Petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Y. Dabke, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C.
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a deliberate or willful breach of this Court's order was established given the return of the seized weapon.
Gulam Mustafa Malik
S.G. Sabale
Anr.
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
