High Court allowed a Civil Application to implead Applicants as Respondents in an underlying Writ Petition. Directs necessary amendment and service of petition copies within specified timelines.
Civil Application allowed permitting impleadment of Applicants as Respondents with directions for amendment and service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.8304 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2629 OF 2016
Milind Balwantrao Chavan & Ors. .… Applicants In the matter between Shahupuri Grampanchayat, Tal. Shahupuri, Dist. Satara. …. Petitioner
V/s.
Tahsildar, Satara & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. V.S. Kapse, i/by Mr. Datta Mane, for the Applicants.
Mr. Ajit Kenjale for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.M. Mali, A.G.P., for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J. DATE : 18TH MARCH 2016.
P.C. :
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1/1
CAW-st.-8304-06.doc
Milind Balwantrao Chavan & Ors.
Shahupuri Grampanchayat, Tal. Shahupuri, Dist. Satara
Tahsildar, Satara
RANJIT MORE
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
