The court allowed a request to amend a PIL petition based on subsequent events during the pendency of the case, ordering service of the amended petition and adjourning for reply.
Chamber Summons allowed; amendment permitted; fresh admission date set.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
chsw-67-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 67 OF 2016 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.85 OF 2014
Movement for Peace and Justice ...Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Ms.Meenaz Kakalia i/b Kranti L.C. for the Applicant. Mr.Milind More, Addl.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.Parag Vyas a/w Mr.H.V.Mehta for Respondent No.2.-UoI.
CORAM : A.S.OKA &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 16 JUNE 2016
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant.
Addl.GP for the first Respondent as well as the learned Counsel appearing
for the second Respondent.
pendency of the PIL and the prayers are sought to be added on the basis of subsequent events.
1/2
Uday.P.Kambli
2/2
chsw-67-16.doc
rights and contentions of the parties, the proposed amendment deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(A.S.OKA, J.)
2/2
Uday.P.Kambli
Movement for Peace and Justice
State of Maharashtra
Anr
A.S.Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
