Civil application seeking to fix a peremptory date for hearing a pending appeal was rejected by the Bombay High Court due to the backlog of Family Court Appeals from 2008 onwards.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cam139
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.139 OF 2016 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.140 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Applicant
Mr.A.A.Siddiquie for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : JUNE 15, 2016
P.C.
1None appears for the applicant. The
prayer in this application is for
fixing a peremptory date of hearing to
the appeal of the year 2013. Family
Court Appeals from the year 2008
onwards are pending for final hearing.
Hence, as of today, no priority can be
given to the hearing of the appeal of
the year 2013. Accordingly, civil
application is rejected.
P.C.
Mr. A.A. Siddiquie
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court