Application by respondents to modify an interim order granting relief was rejected as no change in circumstances was established.
Application for modification of interim order rejected and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW.3371.2015(P-3)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3371 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8672 OF 2012
Samir Bhaskar Kale & Anr. ...Applicants (Respondent Nos. 2 & 3)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Ajit Dattatraya Kale ...Petitioner Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Uday B. Nighot for the Applicants in CAW No.3371 of 2015 Mr. S.R. Waghmare for the Petitioner in WP No.8672 of 2012 Mr.V.S. Gokhale AGP for the State
CORAM : A.S.OKA, & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2016
P.C.:
Not on board. Taken on board. Heard.
Samir Bhaskar Kale
Ajit Dattatraya Kale
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
A.S. Oka
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
