Disposed
Pravindingh Raghuvirsingh Baghel v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai 4 Ors.
Bombay HCCHSW/231/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oschs231
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBR SUMMONS NO.231 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2049 OF 2015
Pravinsingh Raghuvirsingh Baghel ...Applicant
vs.
Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Sanjay Jain i/b Mr.G.S.Sasidharan for the
applicant/petitioner
Ms Shobha Ajitkumar for the respondent No.1
Ms Anjali Helekar, AGP for respondent No.4
Mr.Amit Shastri, AGP for respondent No.5
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
C.V.BHADANG,JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 11, 2016
P.C.:
1Heard the learned counsel for the applicant,
the learned AGP for State and the learned counsel
for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. We have also heard
the learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
Amendment is sought at pre-admission stage. Hence,
the same is allowed without prejudice to the rights
and contentions of the parties in the main petition.
Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a). Amendment shall be carried out within a
period of three weeks from today.
2Place the petition on 16th February 2016 under
the caption of `Fresh Matters'. Ad-interim relief
granted earlier to continue till then. Reply, if
oschs231
2
any, to the amended petition shall be filed within a
period of four weeks from today.
(C.V.BHADANG,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Pravinsingh Raghuvirsingh Baghel
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
A.S.OKA
C.V.BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court