This order allows a civil application to restore a writ petition by condoning delay. The court lists the writ petition for a final hearing without dispatching a final order on the merits at this stage.
The civil application was allowed to restore the writ petition. The writ petition was listed for a final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dgm 1
902-caw-1108-16.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1108 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3827 OF 1999
A. B. Pillay and ors.
.... Petitioners
vs
The Union of India and anr.
.... Respondents
Ms. Annie Nadae I/by Mr. S. P. Saxena for the Applicants/Petitioners. Mr. N. R. Prajapati for respondent-Union of India.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE : December 07, 2016
ORDER:
Considering the averments so made and as sufficient case
is made and in the interest of justice, we are inclined to restore the
writ petition by condoning the delay as prayed.
(a) and (b). No costs.
1/1
A. B. Pillay and ors.
The Union of India
Anoop V. Motta
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
