The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a civil application for restoration of a writ petition, holding that since the parent writ petition was disposed of on merits, the application was not maintainable.
Civil Application No. 1113 of 2016 is dismissed on the ground of non-maintainability.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45 caw 1113-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1113 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4709 OF 2015
Rajshekhar Sidram Bhimade
..Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Manoj Harit i/b. Manoj Harit & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.P.G.Sawabt, AGP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ. DATED : JULY 25, 2016.
P.C.
this application for restoration is not maintainable. Civil Application is accordingly dismissed.
Petition No.4709 of 2015 is not complied with, the petitioner is always at liberty to file contempt petition.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 of 1
pps
Rajshekhar Sidram Bhimade
The State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
