Disposed
Akshay Vitthal Shetty v. State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2050/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION [LD.] NO. 1889 OF 2016
Akshay Vitthal Shetty. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents.
..Respondents.
Mr. Chirag Mody, Sunil Gangan, Mr. Jayant Mestry i/b RMG Law Associates for the Petitioner.
Mr. B. B. Sharma, AGP for the Respondent – State. Smt. Pradnya Walke, Executive Engineer, Presidency Division, PWD, Mumbai is present.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : July 22, 2016 .
P. C. :
1 / 2
patilsr
Respondent No. 2, who is present in the Court makes a statement that subject premises which are sealed, will be de-sealed during the course of the day and thereafter the Petitioner will be heard in pursuance of the notice dated 8th July 2016 and thereafter appropriate orders will be passed. Statement is accepted.
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
Akshay Vitthal Shetty
State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court