Civil Application to restore a Writ Petition. Bench condoned delay in filing restoration and non-appearance of counsel, ordering restoration of WP No.1716 of 2011 to the file.
The Civil Application is allowed; the Writ Petition No.1716 of 2011 is restored to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-CAW-1054-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1054 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1716 OF 2011
Shri Vajir Kondaji Shaikh ..Applicant/Petitioner Versus The Education Officer (Primary) & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. L.S.Deshmukh , Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. A.S.Kulkarni i/by V. Killedar, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.G.Sawant , AGP for the State.
Coram : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, JJ. Date : 28th APRIL, 2016.
P. C. :
Having gone through the averments made in the Civil Application, we find that there is sufficient reason for not filing application for restoration within time. Accordingly, we condone the delay. We also find that there is sufficient cause for nonappearance of the counsel when the matter was called out. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The Writ Petition No.1716 of 2011 is restored to the file.
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
1/1
Shivgan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing application for restoration is condonable.
Whether non-appearance of counsel warrants an adjournment or disposal.
Shri Vajir Kondaji Shaikh
The Education Officer (Primary) & Ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
