A single bench dismissed an application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition due to gross unexplained delay of over six years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
CA0/210/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.210 OF 2013 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.29055 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3783 OF 2007
Miss Meenakshi Dattatraya Koli
….. Applicant.
V/s
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
…... Respondents.
Mr. V.K. Bodhare i/b Mr. A.M. Joshi for the Applicant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE: 16th February 2016
P.C.:-
2/2
CA0/210/2013
information that the doubt expressed by the Vigilance Cell in respect of his brother's certificate was misconceived. No particulars have been mentioned as to why the application was filed under the RTI Act and when the information was received by him. Delay of almost six years is therefore not explained. The date on which the SLP was dismissed also is not mentioned in para 2 of the application, though the annexture to the Review Petition shows that the SLP was dismissed on 25/08/2008. Almost six years thereafter the present application has been filed.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay of over six years in filing a review petition is justified.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Miss Meenakshi Dattatraya Koli
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
