Peter Pereira v. Blossom Pereira Nee Blossom Jasper Disilva
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for interim maintenance rejected as applicant, an ex-employee of the Ministry of Defence Oman who still had earning capacity, suppressed facts regarding post-1991 employment before the Family Court.
What did the court decide?
Application for interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 per month rejected.
What the court decided
19.CAM.94.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2016
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2010
Shri Peter Pereira … Applicant V/s. Mrs. Blossom Peter Pereira … Respondent
Mr. peter Joseph Pereira applicant (husband) in person. Mr. P. M. Shah a/w Ms. Jign Shah for respondent (wife).
CORAM : A. S. OKA & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 20 JULY, 2016.
P.C. :
1 . Heard the Applicant–husband appearing in person. He is
the Appellant in the Family Court Appeal. He filed a petition for divorce against the Respondent-wife in the Family Court at Bandra. By the decree which is a subject matter of challenge in the Family
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an applicant can claim interim maintenance when he has earned capacity and suppressed information about post-retirement employment and income.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shri Peter Pereira
- respondent
Mrs. Blossom Peter Pereira
Coram
A. S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court