Disposed

Sayed Aquces Ahmed Qudri v. Nooruzia Qadri

Bombay HC20 Jul 2016CAM/277/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that custody and visitation orders are not final and can be modified in case of major change in circumstances. The applicant was granted liberty to approach the Family Court for modification based on subsequent events.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file appropriate proceedings in the Family Court seeking modification of visitation directions based on subsequent events.

Sayed Aquces Ahmed Qudri Vs Nooruzia Qadri — Child Custody and Guardianship | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

7.CAM.277.10.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 277 OF 2010

¶4

¶5

FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2005

¶6

Sayed Aqueel Ahmed Quadri	… Applicant
V/s.
Norruzia Quadri	… Respondent

¶7

Mr. R. R. Salvi for the Applicant. Mr. Sayeed Akhtar a/w. Khushnood Akhtar & Ms. Pradnya Meshram for the Respondent.

¶8

CORAM : A. S. OKA & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 20 JULY, 2016.

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

As far as prayer (a) is concerned, it seeks modification of the final judgment and order of this Court passed on 18^th July 2009 in the Family Court Appeal. Clause ( f ) of paragraph 4 of the judgment and order dated 18^th July 2009, makes a provision for visitation rights for the appellant's mother. Modification is sought on the basis of subsequent events.

¶11

As far as orders of the Court regarding the custody of the minor child and as regarding visitation rights are concerned, the

¶12

Habeeb 1/3

¶13

7.CAM.277.10.odt

¶14

same are never final in the sense that in the event of any major change in circumstances, the parties can always apply for modification of such orders.

¶15

Considering the averments made in the application, we grant liberty to the Applicant to file appropriate proceedings before the Family Court seeking modification of the direction contained in the judgment and order of this Court on the basis of the alleged subsequent events. Family Court being the Court of first instance, will have jurisdiction to deal with the application in accordance with law.

¶16

As far as prayer (b) is concerned, there is already an order passed in terms of clause ( b ) of paragraph 4 of the judgment in Family Court Appeal for deposit of certain amount. If the account particulars of the Respondent are not yet furnished, the Advocate for the Respondent will furnish the account particulars along with a copy of canceled cheque of the account to the Advocate of Applicant

2/3

Habeeb

7.CAM.277.10.odt

within a period of one month from today. The Applicant shall

¶21

transfer the requisite amount to the said account of the Respondent.

¶22

Application is disposed of on the above terms.

¶23

(A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)

¶24

Habeeb 3/3

Sayed Aquces Ahmed Qudri v. Nooruzia Qadri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayed Aquces Ahmed Qudri v. Nooruzia Qadri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs Dbs Bank Ltd.

Swati Spentose Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sartorius Stedim India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Hansraj Ramji Cheeda Vs Gangji Ramji Chheda and 2 Ors.

Mrs. Manisha Dayanand Govekar Vs Mr. Dayanand Vasudeo Govekar

Mrs. Manisha Dayanand Govekar Vs Mr. Dayanand Vasudeo Govekar

Peter Pereira Vs Blossom Pereira Nee Blossom Jasper Disilva