The court dismissed the Civil Applications in the Family Court Appeal regarding delay. The delay was condoned as satisfactorily explained, and the applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FCAST.27004/2015(38)
CAM.349/2015-350/2015-
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 349 OF 2015 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 27004 OF 2015
Shri Vinay C. Singh ...Applicant Vs. Smt. Anju Vinay Singh ...Respondent
Mr. Dilip Shukla a/w. Bhati i/b. J.S. Pandey for the Applicant Ms. Anita Dwivedi, Advocate for the Respondent No.1
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2016.
P.C. :
1] Heard. Perused the application and considered the submissions. The delay is satisfactorily explained. The delay is condoned. The application is disposed of.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
1/1
Shri Vinay C. Singh
Smt. Anju Vinay Singh
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
