This court rejected an application for stay of an impugned decree declaring marriage nullity. The court held there was no occasion for a stay since the petition seeking the nullity was not pending or did not exist.
The application for stay of the impugned decree was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21_cam_347_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.347 OF 2015
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.110 OF 2016
Mr. Sandesh Sudhakar Shinde ...Applicant /Appellant
Versus
Mrs. Archana Sandesh Shinde @ Miss Archana Arun Dalvi
...Respondent
...
Mr. Vikas Vasant Khanolkar for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Rajagopal Sellamutha for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 13th DECEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
The prayer is for stay of the impugned decree. By the impugned decree, the petition of the Applicant-husband for declaring the marriage between the Applicant-husband and Respondent -wife as nullity. Therefore, there is no occasion to stay the impugned decree. The application is accordingly, rejected.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal against a decree declaring marriage nullity merits a stay order when no pending petition exists to stay.
Sandesh Sudhakar Shinde
Archana Sandesh Shinde
A.S. OKA
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
