The court disposed of a writ petition challenging a survey communication already decided in a pending chamber summons. The remedy is kept open for further challenge to that specific communication.
Pending Chamber Summons No.121 of 2016 disposed of; petition disposed of; remedy to challenge the communication kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oswp554
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.554 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.R.D.Mishra for the Petitioner
Mr.U.S.Upadhyay, AGP for State
Mr.Ashish Mishra, AGP for the applicant in CHSW
121/2016
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2016
P.C.
1The learned AGP has placed on
record a communication dated 8th
December2016issuedbythe
Superintendent of Mumbai City Survey
and Land Records (City). The same is
taken on record and marked `X-1' for
identification. A copy of the said
communication be supplied to the
Advocate for the petitioner.
2The said letter shows that the
application made by the petitioner
which is the subject matter of prayer
clause (a) has been already decided.
We, therefore, dispose of this
2 oswp554 petition. However, remedy of the petitioner of challenging the communication dated 8th December 2016 is kept open. Pending Chamber Summons (L)No.121 of 2016 does not survive and the same is disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Petitioner
State
A.S. OKA
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court