High Court stayed the execution of a Family Court decree granting restitution of conjugal rights pending final hearing of the wife's appeal against that decree.
Stayed the operation and execution of clause 2 of the operative part of the impugned judgment and decree dated 24th May, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 12_cam_274_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.274 OF 2016
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.155 OF 2016
Mrs. Riddhi Dharmesh Thanawala ...Appellant
Versus
Mr. Dharmesh Tushar Thanawala ...Respondent
...
Mr. Sanjeev R. Singh for the Appellant /Applicant wife. Ms Tanu Khatri for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 21st DECEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
An appeal preferred by the wife for challenging the decree of restitution of conjugal rights passed by the Family Court in the petition filed by the Respondent-Husband has been admitted for final hearing. Therefore, that part of the impugned decree will have to be stayed till the final dispose of the appeal. Accordingly, we dispose of the application by passing following order:
ORDER
Till the final disposal of the appeal, the operation and
Megha
1/2
Megha 12_cam_274_2016.doc
execution of clause 2 of the operative part of the impugned judgment
and decree dated 24th May, 2016 shall remain stayed.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
2/2
Mrs. Riddhi Dharmesh Thanawala
Mr. Dharmesh Tushar Thanawala
A.S. OKA
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
