Appellant wife challenged the Family Court's dismissal of her divorce petition. Court held that since the question of staying the decree was not raised, no relief was granted, and the application was disposed of without merit.
None granted; application disposed of as no question of staying the decree was raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 12_cam_247_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.247 OF 2016
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.158 OF 2016
Mrs. Riddhi Dharmesh Thanawala ...Appellant
Versus
Mr. Dharmesh Tushar Thanawala ...Respondent
...
Mr. Sanjeev R. Singh for the Appellant /Applicant wife. Ms Tanu Khatri for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 21st DECEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. By this appeal the Applicant has challenged that part of the impugned decree by which the petition for divorce filed by her has been dismissed. There is no question of staying the decree of dismissal of the petition. Hence, no relief to be granted in this application. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant relief in an appeal challenging the dismissal of a divorce petition filed by the appellant.
Whether to stay the decree dismissing the divorce petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Riddhi Dharmesh Thanawala
Mr. Dharmesh Tushar Thanawala
A.S. Oka
Anuj Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
