Disposed
Abdul Sattar Abdul Hamid Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1092/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Rule discharged.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k
1/1
13 wp 1092.16 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1092 OF 2016
Abdul Sattar Abdul Hamid Shaikh ….. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Udaynath N. Tripathi for the Petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 14 JUNE 2016
ORDER:
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the impugned order of detention has been revoked. Hence, nothing survives in the Petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
katkam
1/1
Abdul Sattar Abdul Hamid Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court