Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shri Maruti Sonaba Chorge (Org.Respondent) Vs… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

Home
Bombay HC
2016
Shri Maruti Sonaba Chorge (Org.Respondent) Vs MaharaShri Maruti Sonaba Chorge (Org.Respondent) v. Maharastra Raj

Allowed

Shri Maruti Sonaba Chorge (Org.Respondent) v. Maharastra Rajya Sahakari Krushi Gramin Vikas Bank Maraydit., (Org. Petitioner)

Bombay HC28 Jul 2016CAL/65/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application seeking withdrawal of backwages deposited by the respondent Bank after the dismissal of a writ petition challenging a Labour Court order, the High Court of Bombay permitted the withdrawal, finding no legal impediment in the circumstances. The matter was disposed of by granting the prayer.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was permitted to withdraw the backwages amount deposited by the respondent Bank.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

The applicant was permitted to withdraw the backwages amount deposited by the respondent Bank.

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to withdraw the backwages amount deposited by the respondent-Bank following the dismissal of the underlying writ petition.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The High Court permitted an applicant to withdraw the backwages amount deposited by the respondent Bank. The prayer was allowed after the dismissal of the underlying Writ Petition and Letter Patent Appeal challenging the Labour Court's impugned order, with the High Court finding no legal bar to such withdrawal under the specific circumstances.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

prod-1-cal-65-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2014 IN LATTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.225 OF 2010 IN

WRIT PETITION NO.977 OF 2009

Maruti Sonaba Chorge

...Applicant

vs.

Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Krushi Gramin Vikas Bank Maryadit

...Respondent

Mr. Prashant Kamble, for the Applicant. Mr. Shailesh Chavan i/b. Mr. Milind Deshmukh, for the Respondent

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : JULY 28, 2016

P.C.:

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the Civil Application.

Against the order passed by the Labour Court, Pune dated 29^th May, 2007 the Respondent herein the Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Krushi Gramin Vikas Bank Maryadit had filed Writ Petition No. 977 of 2009. The said Writ Petition was dismissed on 17^th August,

1/2

Vishal Parekar

prod-1-cal-65-2014

During the pendency of the said Writ Petition, as per the interim order passed by this Court on 19^th March, 2009 the Respondent-Bank was directed to deposit 25% backwages in this Court as per the order passed by the Labour Court. As the Writ Petition has been dismissed, the Latters Patent Appeal No. 225 of 2010 has also been dismissed, in the circumstances, a prayer has been made through this Civil Application seeking withdrawal of the amount of backwages deposited by the Bank.

Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, we find no legal impediment for allowing the the prayer made in the Civil Application to withdraw the amount of backwages of the Applicant deposited by the Respondent-Bank. As a result, we permit the Petitioner to withdraw the amount deposited by the Respondent-Bank.

The Civil Application accordingly stands disposed of.

2/2

Vishal Parekar

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the applicant is entitled to withdraw the backwages amount deposited by the respondent-Bank following the dismissal of the underlying writ petition.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Maruti Sonaba Chorge
respondent
Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Krushi Gramin Vikas Bank Maryadit

Coram

AI extract

Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 28 Jul 2016 · July
Registered: 16 Sept 2014
Case no.: CAL/65/2014
CNR: HCBM010293392014
Topic: Service and Employment
Bench: M. S. Karnik Shantanu S. Kemkar

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from M. S. Karnik Shantanu S. Kemkar

Suryakant Shinde Vs Honorable Municipal Commissioner of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
27 Jul 2016
Parle Gurudeo Chsl Vs Municipal Commissioner for Grihanmumbai and 2 Ors.
27 Jul 2016
Saurabh Shirish Palaye Vs the Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.
27 Jul 2016
Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Nagar Rahivasi Sangh Vs the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and Anr.
28 Jul 2016
M/S. Accent Metals Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Ors.
28 Jul 2016
Click Investment and Trading Co. Pvt.Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
29 Jul 2016

Cite this judgement

Shri Maruti Sonaba Chorge (Org.Respondent) v. Maharastra Rajya Sahakari Krushi Gramin Vikas Bank Maraydit., (Org. Petitioner), CAL/65/2014 (BOM), decided on 28 July 2016.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Shantanu Kemkar and Makarand Karnik

Parties & counsel