A civil application filed by an applicant in P.I.L. No. 39 of 2003 before the Bombay High Court was allowed to be withdrawn by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAI. 52-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 52 OF 2016 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 39 OF 2003
Mahatma Laxmanji Arya Education Public Charitable Trust, Panchgani … Applicants In the matter between: Bombay Environment Action Group & Anr. … Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents ***
Mr. Rohan Kelkar, Ms. Pooja Kothari, Ms. Namrata Vinod i/b Federal & Rashmikant, for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. K. Gopalan i/b Haresh Mehta & Co., for Respondent Nos. 12. Mr. Arpit Singhvi i/b M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for the Respondent No. 7.
Mr. N. D. Sharma, for the Respondent – UOI.
Ms. Tanaya Goswami i/b Ajinky Jaibhave, for the Applicant in CAI. 52/2016.
*** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2016 PC.
. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants seeks leave to withdraw the civil application. Civil application is allowed to be withdrawn and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Mahatma Laxmanji Arya Education Public Charitable Trust
V. M. Kanade
Nutan D. Sardessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
