Application for quashing a complaint dismissed as the trial has already commenced, rendering the quashing by consent unnecessary.
Criminal application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APL 1116 of 2016
1/1
BDP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1116 OF 2016
Shrinivasan Venkatramani Iyer Vs.
...Applicant
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. S. Balakrishnan i/b. Sagar Talekar for the Applicant Mrs. M.H. Mhatre -APP for the State Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for Respondent No.2
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2016
P.C. :
We are informed that the trial has already begun and, as such,
question of quashing the complaint by consent does not arise. Hence, criminal application is dismissed.
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Shrinivasan Venkatramani Iyer
State of Maharashtra
Anr.
V. M. Kanade
Ms. Nutan D. Sardesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
