THE HIGH COURT
Application allowed; decretal amount permitted to be deposited by applicants within two weeks for stay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf.787.16
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application [CAF] No.787 of 2016 in
First Appeal No.1022 of 2014
(State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Wardha and others
vs.
Brijmohan Sajjankumarji Mohata and another)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Mrs. Mayuri Deshmukh, A.G.P. for the Applicants/Appellants. Shri R.M. Bhangde, Advocate for the Non-Applicants/Respondents.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 11th MARCH, 2016.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.
The entire decretal amount is permitted to be deposited by the applicants. If so deposited within a period of two weeks from today, there shall be stay in terms of prayer clause (ii) of the application.
Stand over to 28th of March, 2016.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*sdw
State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Wardha and others
Brijmohan Sajjankumarji Mohata and another
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
