Allowed
Sujata Chakravarti v. Jyoti Kishore Pandit and Anr.
Bombay HCCAF/3032/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
914caf3032-09.doc
1/1
PVR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Application NO. 3032 OF 2009 IN First Appeal (ST) NO. 17274 OF 2009
Sujata Chakravarti ...Appellant Versus Jyoti Kishore Pandit And Anr ...Respondents
Mr.Jayant Gaikwad, for the Applicant.
Mrs.Poonam R.Mital, for Respondent No.2.
---
CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 22 NOVEMBER 2016.
P.C. :
Counsel for the contesting Respondent No.2-New India Assurance
Company Ltd.
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). No costs.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.)
Sujata Chakravarti
Jyoti Kishore Pandit
New India Assurance Company Ltd.
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court