Single judge case disposing of three appeals against interim orders. The court agreed with parties that the underlying 2009 Long Cause Suits be decided directly, dismissing appeals without substantive adjudication.
Appeals dismissed; parties directed to approach Trial Court for the underlying suits; contentions on merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906ao657-656-659-15.doc
PVR 1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Appeal from Order NO. 657 OF 2015
Iqbal Dawood Shaikh ...Appellant Versus Pandit Gulam Dastagir Abbas And Anr ...Respondents
WITH Appeal from Order NO. 656 OF 2015
Iqbal Dawood Shaikh ...Appellant Versus Hakimuddin H. Deshmukh And Anr ...Respondents
WITH Appeal from Order NO. 659 OF 2015
Iqbal Dawood Shaikh ...Appellant Versus Asfaq Ul Haq Khan And Anr ...Respondents
Mr.Jintendra B.Mishra, for the Appellant in all matters.
Mr.S.K.Pise, for Respondent No.1 in AO 657/15.
Mrs.Priti Shah, for Respondent No.1 in AO 659/15.
--- CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 22 NOVEMBER 2016.
P.C. :
PVR 2/3 906ao657-656-659-15.doc
the year 2009. These proceedings arise out of the interim orders passed on the Notices of Motion which have been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff in respective suits. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and considering the nature of the dispute, the suggestion as made on behalf of the parties is fair. It would be appropriate that the suits itself are decided. The orders which are impugned in these appeals are also in operation from February,2015.
PVR 3/3 906ao657-656-659-15.doc
contentions of the parties on merits of the matter are expressly kept open to be decided in the pending suits.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J.)
Iqbal Dawood Shaikh
Pandit Gulam Dastagir Abbas
GS Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
