The High Court Civil Application was dismissed as there was no substantive content or reason to allow the Civil Application, which sought condonation of delay. The judgment is a thin order rejecting the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30.caf.132.2015.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2015 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1624 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 33036 OF 2014
Mrs Vasanti Pragji Thakkar ...Applicant vs Mr Mukesh Jamnadas Thakkar ...Respondent
Prof. Rohini Dandekar for the Applicant Mr R.S.Yadav i/b R.R.Sharma for the Respondent
CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI , J. 09 DECEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
Heard Ms Rohini Dandekar learned counsel for the applicant and Mr Yadav learned counsel for the Respondent. This Civil Application is preferred by the applicant/ original plaintiff seeking condonation of delay of 46 days in filing the First Appeal. Considering the averments, which are made in the Civil Application, in the interest of justice this Civil Application deserves to be allowed. It is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). No costs. List the First Appeal for admission after six weeks from today.
( G.S.KULKARNI , J. )
Pg 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 46 days in filing the First Appeal deserves condonation.
What is the order on the application for condonation of delay.
Mrs Vasanti Pragji Thakkar
Mr Mukesh Jamnadas Thakkar
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
