In this civil application seeking condonation of a 29-day delay in filing an appeal, the Bombay High Court held that the delay was deserving of condonation in the interest of justice and allowed the application.
The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P9-2-CAF-2640-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2640 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 8633 OF 2016
The New India Assurance Co.Ltd.
…Appellant
Versus
Smt. Rupa Kumar Zagade & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Sudhakar Pandurang More, for the Appellant.
Mr. Y.G. Thorat, i/b Mr. A.B. Tajane for the Respondents.
CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J. DATE : 8th December 2016
ORDER :
Company, the learned Counsel for the Respondents. By this
Application, the Appellant seeks condonation of delay of 29 days in filing of this Appeal. Having considered the averments made in the
Sharayu . 1 / 2
P9-2-CAF-2640-16.doc
Civil Application and in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. The Civil Application is accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]
2 / 2
Sharayu .
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing civil application deserves condonation.
Whether the condonation of delay should be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Smt. Rupa Kumar Zagade
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
