Single-bench order allowing applications for the addition of party respondents in two connected writ petitions. The court directed amendment of records within two weeks and issuance of notices to added respondents.
Applications for addition of party respondents allowed; amendment within two weeks; notice to added respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca9955.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9955 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1226 OF 2014
Charanraj Pandhri Waghmare .. APPLICANT
VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. B.R. Kawre, advocate for applicant. Mr. V.M. Kangne, AGP for the State. Mr. D.P. Palodkar, advocate for respondent no. 3.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9954 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1224 OF 2014
Parmeshwar Bhagwat Sonawane .. APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. B.R. Kawre, advocate for applicant. Mr. V.M. Kangne, AGP for the State. Mr. D.P. Palodkar, advocate for respondent no. 3. =====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
ca9955.16.doc
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether applications for the addition of party respondents should be allowed.
Charanraj Pandhri Waghmare
The State of Maharashtra
Parmeshwar Bhagwat Sonawane
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
