Disposed
Vyankatrao Dyanoba Mane v. Mukesh Balasaheb Rajemane and Others
Bombay HCCA/6329/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6329 OF 2016
IN/WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3736 OF 2016
WITH WP/3737/2016 WITH WP/3758/2016
VYANKATRAO S/O DYANOBA MANE
VERSUS
MUKESH BALASAHEB RAJEMANE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. H.P. Jadhav
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.G. Magre
Advocate for Respondent nos. 4 and 5 : Mr. V.D. Gunale
Advocate for petitioner in WP : Mr. S.C. Swami
...
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
Dated: June 09, 2016
...
PER COURT :-
Heard.
2.Application is allowed without prejudice
to the contentions of the parties to the Petition
and same stands disposed of.
3.The applicant to be impleaded as party
respondent. Notice to added respondent. Mr. H.P.
Jadhav waives service of notice on behalf of added
respondent and prays three weeks time for filing
reply. At his request, stand over to 14th July,
2016.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) ( S.S. SHINDE, J.)
sga/-
Vyankatrao S/O Dyano Mane
Mukesh Balasaheb Rajemane
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court