Disposed
Gaurishankar Rukhmeshchandra Mishra v. Asaram Shankar Jagdale and Ors.
Bombay HCCA/5416/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5416.2012CA.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5416 OF 2012
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2001
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5417 OF 2012
Gaurishankar s/o.Rukhmeshchandra Mishra
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
Asaram s/o. Shankar Jagdale,
and others.
..RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.A.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for the Applicant
Mr.S.V. Adwant, Advocate for respondent Nos.4
and 8
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE, J.
Date : 8th September, 2016
PER COURT :
Not on board. On mentioning, taken
on board.
2.The learned counsel appearing for
Respondent nos. 4 and 8 submits that he has
already given notice to the learned counsel
appearing for the review applicant.
2
5416.2012CA.odt
3.This matter is moved for speaking to
the minutes. It appears that, in the judgment
dated 30th August, 2016, instead of appearance
of “Mr.P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel, instructed
by Mr. S.V. Adwant, Advocate for respondent
Nos.4 and 8”, inadvertently it is mentioned
as “Mr.P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel, instructed
by Mr. S.V. Savant, Advocate for respondent
Nos.4 and 8”.
4.The name of Advocate Mr.S.V. Savant be
substituted by Advocate Mr.S.V. Adwant in the
judgment dated 30th August, 2016.
5. The motion is disposed of accordingly.
[S.S.SHINDE]
JUDGE
sga
Gaurishankar s/o Rukhmeshchandra Mishra
Asaram s/o Shankar Jagdale
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court