This single-judge order allowed the applicant's civil application to recall and restore a prior writ petition to its original file, as the applicant was a necessary party absent from the earlier hearing.
Writ petition recalled and restated to original file; application allowed and disposed of; liberty to move appropriate bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12611.2013CA.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12611 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5436 OF 2013
... BANSILAL S/O. POKHARDAS MOTWANI VERSUS SATISH S/O. PRALHADRAO BODLE & OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.A.S.Barolota Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.N.Nagargoje AGP for Respondent/State: Mr.V.S.Badakh.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Date : July 5, 2016
PER COURT :
12611.2013CA.odt
2
[S.S. SHINDE, J.]
DDC
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be restored to original file when necessary party was absent during prior hearing.
Bansilal S/o. Pokhardas Motwani
Satish S/o. Pralhadrao Bodle
Others
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
