The High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 4912 of 2016. The respondent Corporation disputed the petitioner's entitlement to claim an amount, leaving them to avail remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
930.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 WRIT PETITION NO. 4912 OF 2016
GNI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
KHUSHBIRSING BASATSING BINDRA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS S
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Narwadkar Mrigesh D.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. P. S. Patil
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. A. R. Vaidya
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel appearing the respondent
Corporation is disputing entitlement of the petitioner
to claim the amount. It would be open for the petition
to avail the remedy available in law.
2. With the liberty as aforesaid, writ petition is
disposed of.
(K. L. WADANE, J.) (R. M. BORDE, J. )
JPC
1/1
GNI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR KHUSHBIRSING BASATSING BINDRA
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WADANE
BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court