Single judge allowed a company application to recall an order dismissing a company petition, accepting the advocate's explanation for absence and restoring the petition to file for listing.
Order dated 11.6.2014 recalled; petition restored to file for listing in usual turn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA409.14-903
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2014
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.355 OF 2014
M/s.H.R.Solutions
….Applicants
V/s.
M/s.Ion Exchange (India) Limited ---Mr.B.B.Nangare for the applicants. Adv.Megha Kadam for respondents.
....Respondents
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 7.1.2016
P.C.:-
1 This application is for re-calling the order dated 11.6.2014 dismissing the petition. I have considered the affidavit in support of this application which is filed by the Advocate explaining as to why he could not remain present on 11.6.2014. I am accepting the explanation given thereto. In view thereof, the order dated 11.6.2014 is re-called and the petition is restored to file.
2 The company petition to be listed in its usual turn/CMIS date.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
KJ
CA409.14-903
2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.
KJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing the company petition can be recalled due to an advance of counsel.
M/s.H.R.Solutions
M/s.Ion Exchange (India) Limited
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
