The appellant's application challenging the dismissal of a company application was dismissed because the applicant was not present. The High Court in Insolvency Jurisdiction held that the earlier order dated 23rd December, 2015 by the Company Registrar dismissing the application remains in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907.CAL-25-2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS INSOLVENCY JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.25 OF 2015 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.744 OF 2014
Surbit Impex Pvt. Ltd. ….Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Jiangsu Geo Tai Int'L Group Hua Tai Imp. And Exp. Co. ….Petitioner Vs. Surbit Impex Pvt. Ltd. ….Respondent ----
Mr. Adil Gandhi i/b. M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the petitioner. None for the applicant/respondent.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 6th January, 2016
P.C.:-
None present for the applicant. For reasons mentioned in the order dated 23rd December, 2015 passed by the Company Registrar, the application stands dismissed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
Gauri Gaekwad
Jiangsu Geo Tai Int'L Group Hua Tai Imp. And Exp. Co.
Surbit Impex Pvt. Ltd.
Surbit Impex Pvt. Ltd.
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
