Disposed

Siddharth Mahendra Mehta v. Atlanta Premises Co-Op Society Ltd. and Another

Bombay HC17 Mar 2016CA/245/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a company application regarding the official liquidator's report and payment of maintenance charges and society bills. The application was concluded with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Official Liquidator's Report made absolute as per prayer clause (a). Applicant to pay bills after 7th August 2015; Official Liquidator to pay prior bills. No order as to costs.

Siddharth Mahendra Mehta Vs Atlanta Premises Co-Op… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

947-CAL817-15.DOC

¶2

Shephali

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO. 817 OF 2015

¶4

IN

¶5

COMPANY PETITION NO. 536 OF 2003

¶6

Siddharth Mahendra Mehta…Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Atlanta Premises Cooperative Society Ltd. & …Respondents
Anr.

¶9

WITH OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR'S REPORT NO. 56 OF 2016 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 536 OF 2003 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO. 406 OF 2004 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO. 655 OF 2004 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO. 729 OF 2004

¶10

Mr. Sunny Punamiya , for the Applicants.

¶11

Mr. Sumeet Patni, i/b Som Shankar Sinha, for Respondent No. 1.
Ms. Yogini Chauhan, Dy. Official Liquidator, present.

¶12

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 17th March 2016

¶13

PC:-

¶14

1 of 2

¶15

947-CAL817-15.DOC

¶16

1.The Official Liquidator’s report is not on board. By consent,
it is taken on board.

¶17

2.Ms. Chauhan confirms that the remaining work as regards
the title documents will be completed within a period of two weeks
from today. She also points out that an amount of Rs. 26,01,777/- is
payable to the Society towards unpaid and overdue maintenance
charges. This will be paid out of the funds in the hands of the
Official Liquidator.

¶18

3. The Official Liquidator’s Report is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶19

4.The statements made on behalf of the Official Liquidator are
noted. In view thereof, no specific orders are required on the
Company Application. It is clarified that all society bills and
outgoings for these premises for Office No. 167, Atlanta Building,
Plot No. 2209, 16th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 after
7th August 2015 will be paid by the Applicant. Any bills prior to
that period will need to be paid on behalf of the Company by the
Official Liquidator.

¶20

5.The Company Application is disposed of with no order as to
costs.

¶21

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶22

2 of 2

Siddharth Mahendra Mehta v. Atlanta Premises Co-Op Society Ltd. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddharth Mahendra Mehta v. Atlanta Premises Co-Op Society Ltd. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharashtra State Financial Corportation (Msfc) Vs Official Liquidator of M/S. Glass Corboys and Pressware Ltd. (in Liquidation)

Yunus Gulam Hussein Muchhala and Shirin Yunus Muchhala Vs ...............................................

G.C. Chemie Pharmie Ltd. Vs M/S. Ankur Drugs and Pharma Ltd. (in Liquidation)

City Multihousing Private Limited Vs 0

City Development (Maharashtra ) Private Limited Vs 0

Hemraj Devekarandas Metals and Minerals Private Limited Vs M/S Shree Oshiya Strips Impex Private Limitted Cin U27205MH2010PTC202214