In this order, the High Court allowed a civil application seeking amendment of a writ petition and directed the amendment to be carried out within three weeks.
Amendment of writ petition allowed; amendment to be carried out within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca14935.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14935 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5832 OF 2012
Jijaram s/o Shrikrushna Bagal
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, advocate for applicant. Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, AGP for the State. Mr. S.T. Thombre, advocate for respondent no. 4 in writ petition. Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for respondent no. 6 in writ petition.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
This is an application seeking amendment in the writ petition. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Amendment be carried out within three weeks. Civil application stands disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Jijaram s/o Shrikrushna Bagal
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
