Company Application No. 1069 of 2015 was dismissed by the Bombay High Court for lack of prosecution, as the applicant failed to appear before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1069 OF 2015 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.452 OF 2010
Brian Castellino, Ex-Director of R. Tec Systems Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant In the matter between : Bell Finvest India Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus R-Tec Systems (I) Pvt. Ltd. And Others … Respondents …..
None for the Applicant. Mr. Mahenddhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator present.
CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.
DATE : 29 NOVEMBER 2016.
P.C. :
. None appears for the Applicant. Even on the last occasion, none had appeared for the Applicant. Company Prosecutor from the Office of the Official Liquidator is present. Company Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.C.GUPTE, J.)
Brian Castellino
Bell Finvest India Ltd.
R-Tec Systems (I) Pvt. Ltd.
S.C. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
