Allowed

Suchetan Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Noble Resources and Trading India Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2016ARBP/448/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This arbitration petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act sought a direction to produce documents for a counterclaim. The Court held that relevancy is an arbitration matter and ordered the issuance of a witness summons to the parties required.

What did the court decide?

Office to issue witness summons to the parties described in sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of prayer clause (a)

Suchetan Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Noble Resources and… — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

18-ARBPL-250-16.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 250 OF 2016

¶3

M/s. Suchetan Exports Pvt.Ltd. …Petitioner Versus M/s. Noble Resources and Trading India Pvt. …Respondent Ltd.

¶4

Mr. Rahul Narichania, Senior Advocate, Mr. Prathamesh Kamat, Counsel, MR. Rahul Singh, i/b Legal Catalyst, for the Petitioner.

¶5

Mr. Manoj Khatri, for the Respondent.

¶6

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J. DATE : 23rd February 2016

¶7

P.C. :

¶8

This Petition is under Section 27 of the Arbitration and

¶9

Conciliation Act, 1996 after seeking an appropriate direction from the Arbitral Tribunal. The documents for production of which the present Arbitration Petition is filed, are relevant for the purposes of the Counterclaim of the Petitioner before the learned Arbitrator. Learned Counsel for the Respondent opposes the Petition on the ground that the delivery orders have already been produced. One of the three documents referred to particularly in prayer clause (a),

¶10

Sharayu . 1 / 2

¶11

18-ARBPL-250-16.doc

¶12

namely, original delivery order issued by the Claimant to the Court, has already been produced as secondary evidence and has been exhibited and that the other two documents are not required to be tendered in evidence.

¶13

Anyway, relevancy of the documents is a matter for the Arbitrator to decide. The learned Arbitrator has already permitted the Petitioner to apply for process for their production presumably on the ground that they are relevant for the purposes of the enquiry before him. Production of these documents by issuance of a suitable witness summons is, thus, clearly in order.

¶14

Accordingly, Arbitration Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to issue witness summons, accordingly, to the parties described in sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of prayer clause (a). Returnable date shall be confirmed by the Petitioner with the learned Arbitrator and thereafter, communicated to the office. The witness summons be issued accordingly.

¶15

[S.C. GUPTE, J.]

¶16

Sharayu . 2 / 2

Suchetan Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Noble Resources and Trading India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suchetan Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Noble Resources and Trading India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Hiralal Jaiswal Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and 4 Ors.

Gillette Diversified Operations Pvt.Ltd. Vs Jhs Svendgaard Laboratories Limited

Indostar Capital Finance Ltd. Vs Ravindranath Ge Medical Associates Pvt.Ltd. and Anr.

M/S. Mukesh B. Jhaveri Vs Ratin Mehta

M/S Nimit Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Orion Steel Corporation

M/S Nimit Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Orion Steel Corporation