The High Court disposed of a summary suit based on consent terms tendered by the parties and their advocates, accepting the statements and undertakings therein without granting any order on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48.sj.72.2015.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 72 OF 2015 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 372 OF 2015
Indostar Capital Finance Ltd.
...Applicant/Plaintiff
vs
Ravindranath GE Medical Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Defendants
Mr Monil Punjabi i/b Dhaval Vussonji for the Plaintiff Ms Khursheed Vajifdar i/b J. Sagar Associates for the Defendants.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016
P.C. :
Learned counsel for parties tender consent terms duly signed by parties through their authorized representatives and also their respective advocates. Learned counsel seek disposal of the suit in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The Suit and the Summons for Judgment are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs. Refund of court fees in accordance with the applicable rules.
( S.C.GUPTE J. )
Pg 1 of 1
Indostar Capital Finance Ltd.
Ravindranath GE Medical Associates Pvt. Ltd.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
