The criminal application does not survive in view of a contemporaneous order passed in the connected Criminal Writ Petition and is disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 2.cr.appw.320.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 320 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3124 OF 2014
Anil Ramdas Borse
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms. Rohini Dandekar Advocate appointed for Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : JULY 28, 2016
P.C.:
1 In view of the order passed today in Criminal Writ
Petition No. 3124 of 2014, this application does not survive and
is disposed of as such.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
Anil Ramdas Borse
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhathkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
