The Bombay High Court appointed legal aid counsel for the applicant in jail and allowed the application for condonation of 107 days delay in filing the appeal in the interest of justice.
Delay of 107 days condoned; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 5.cri.appa.895.16.w.apeal.st.514.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 895 OF 2016 IN CRI. APPEAL ST. NO. 514 OF 2016 WITH CRI. APPEAL ST. NO. 514 OF 2016
Shivanand @ Shivaji Fakirappa Adakar
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
None for the applicant / appellant Mrs. U.V.Kejriwal A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : JULY 28, 2016
P.C.:
1 This application and the appeal are filed through jail, hence, we appoint advocate Mr. Prosper D'Souza who is on the panel of Advocates of the High Court Legal Services Committee, to represent the applicant in this application and the appellant in the appeal.
1 of 2
jdk 2 5.cri.appa.895.16.w.apeal.st.514.16.doc
2 This is an application for condonation of delay of 107 days caused in filing the appeal. Looking to the fact that this application is filed through jail and the other facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that in the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned.
3 Application allowed in above terms.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 107 days in filing the appeal condonable in the interest of justice considering the applicant was in jail.
Shivanand @ Shivaji Fakirappa Adakar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhaktar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
