This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appr.492.15.27.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 492 OF 2016 (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 589 OF 2015
Chandrakant Namdeo Pandav ...Applicant Versus Ninaidevi Us Utpadak & Todani Wahatuk Sah. Sanstha Maryadit, & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. A. M. Adagule for the Applicant
Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. FRIDAY, 2nd DECEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
office noting that the respondent No. 1 has been duly served.
45 days in filing the aforesaid revision application.
1/2
SQ Pathan
appr.492.15.27.doc
application, in particular, clauses (vi) and (vii), the application is allowed. Delay of 45 days is condoned.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
SQ Pathan
Chandrakant Namdeo Pandav
Ninaidevi Us Utpadak & Todani Wahatuk Sah. Sanstha Maryadit
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
