Mohd. Rafik Mohd. Hanif Khan and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected two criminal applications filed by applicants as they sought the same relief previously withdrawn in 2014. The judgment held that entertaining them now would amount to an impermissible review, citing precedent, though the appeals were expedited for final hearing.
What did the court decide?
Both criminal applications NO. 270 and 1240 of 2016 are rejected as they amount to review of earlier withdrawn applications.