The High Court rejected a bail application filed by the appellant while the criminal appeal was pending. The Court perused evidence notes, found the trial court's views permissible, and adjourned the appeal to receive the paper book within three months.
Bail application rejected; liberty to hear appeal granted upon receipt of record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 34-crappln838.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2016
IN
CRIMINAL APEAL NO.61 OF 2016
AJIM SHAH @ AJJU S/O AMIR SHAH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr.N.S.Ghanekar, Advocate for Applicant
Mr.M.M.Nerlikar, APP for respondent
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard the learned Counsel for the
applicant/appellant and the learned APP for the
respondent.
2.Perused the notes of evidence. Prima
facie, it appears that the findings recorded by
trial Court are in consonance with the evidence on
record. We do not propose to elaborate the
evidence since the appeal filed by the applicant
2 34-crappln838.odt
is pending. This application for bail stands
rejected.
3.Registry to send back the Record and
Proceedings to the trial Court. Upon receiving the
Record and Proceedings, the trial Court shall
prepare Paper Book and send it back with the
original Record and Proceedings to this Court, as
expeditiously as possible, however, within a
period of three months from today.
4.Upon receipt of the Paper Book and the
original Record and Proceedings by the Registry of
this Court, liberty to mention for hearing of the
appeal granted.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by the convict should be considered without writing in the case.
AJIM SHAH @ AJJU S/O AMIR SHAH
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court