In this criminal application, the High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed a second plea for anticipatory bail filed by the same applicants who had previously withdrawn a similar application, holding that no change in circumstances warranted entertaining the fresh petition and rejecting it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.A-6147-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6147 OF 2016
Dattu Bapurao Madan and others ...APPLICANTS versus
The State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT
Mr. Girish B. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicants Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, APP for respondent
CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J. VACATION COURT
DATED : 11th NOVEMBER, 2016.
Order :-
Sd/-
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second application for anticipatory bail can be entertained when circumstances remain unchanged compared to an earlier withdrawn application.
Dattu Bapurao Madan and others
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
